The Economy, Economists, and
Collective Goods
#007
In an earlier post (#6), I
began, “Why we leave trade up to the economists is worth exploring.” In
contrast with most economists, I concluded that (1) Trade cannot be a private
good; (2) Trade is a collective good, and beyond that has social and cultural
dimensions , embedded in social practices, norms, culture, ritual, beliefs,
social institutions (such as the family), and communities; (3) Trade can,
though not necessarily, enhance the cultural and social distinctiveness of
trading partners.
It was August 16 that I
posted that blog entry. On September 7 the crisis erupted. Federal Housing
Finance Agency put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship. From then
on it was chaos. -- the bankruptcy of Lehmann Brothers, a forced merger of
Merrill Lynch with Bank of America, the US government’s bailout of American
International Group, and now involving international banks. The crisis has been
widely discussed in terms of attributed “causes,” namely, the sub-prime mortgage
debacle, excessive speculation on commodities futures, and the proliferation of
exotic financial instruments.
Yet these are not causes,
but merely symptoms. As I pointed out earlier, trade – whether trade involving
commodities, products, currency,
collateral, debt or credit cannot be a private good. All trade should be embedded in social life so that all are
stakeholders and recognize the gains that others stand to make, and recognize
the risks and losses that the others incur. That is, for example, the mortgage
holder should know what the mortgage lender stands to gain from the mortgage
payments just as the mortgage lender should understand whether the mortgage
holder can make regular payments or not. So far the mortgage holder has had to
disclose everything about their economic worth and livelihood while the
mortgage lender discloses nothing about the profits that it stands to make.
Yes, this will be cumbersome
for international investments. Yes, this will be cumbersome in mass markets.
Yes, this will be cumbersome for the owners of money. Yet it is only asking the
owners of wealth to do what borrowers have always done. My plan has the merits
of restoring the social function of markets and trade, including notably
markets and trade that involve money. Economists are welcome to my proposals.
No charge!!
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: Moncler Jackets | December 03, 2011 at 11:33 AM